Lee Odden has an brought an interesting issue to light in one of his latest blog posts. The issue at hand is client/web designer/SEO relations and responsibilities. I wanted to expand on Lee’s topic for a moment and discuss a few of my recent relationships with clients and their web designers.
Client #1 - a local business
Client #1 needed to get a website designed for her business. Her goals were to get traffic off the internet to give her a call regarding the services she offered. The client found a designer who claimed the website he designed would be “optimized” and search engine friendly. With no reason not to believe what the designer promised, the client proceeded with the web site design project and is now upset at the lack of rankings in the search engines. Client #1 came to me with this website that had been designed for a cost of around $2000. I would say normally for this type/size of project the design fee was fair. However, to help this client out, I must essentially redesign parts (read most) of her website to get it to a point where I can start optimizing. The design itself looks pretty good, however heavy use of images and the limited/somewhat weak information architecture will make it difficult for me to optimize(on-page) without redesigning the site significantly. I now have to tell the client in order to get the best results, the website she not only just paid for but put time into as well, must be restructured to succeed in the search engines. This is a very hard part of my job. Obviously the client is upset with her designer and has to consider whether she has any more budget to throw into this project to make it a success.
Client #2 - brick and mortar retailer
Client #2 runs a retail business in town. He just finished with a design company building a website and e-commerce store. Unfortunately, the design company used off-the-shelf shopping cart software that can’t be customized to utilize some SEO tactics I feel are important for the website. I met this client at a social function and when I told him what I do for living he said “I’ll need to call you next after the official site launch.” Of course I smiled and nodded and said “sounds good.” It was too late to intervene. Client #2’s website would be launching in the next few days. This client knew about SEO, but thought it would be a better “next step” than to consider SEO in the beginning stages of the website design project.
I have a couple more examples that I will share in another blog post soon. For now I think is important to note that my point is SEO education for web designers is a must. They don’t need to do the SEO work, or even understand some of the more technical concepts, however they need to be SEO aware. The designers that add “search engine friendly” or “search engine submissions” to their design proposals without fully understanding the issues, should seek professional SEO help. In most cases these designers are misleading their clients (even if not intentionally) which is no way to run a business. At the same time you could argue “buyer beware” still applies for clients.
So for all you designers out there, get a grip on what SEO services you are offering and promising your clients. Go out and do a little reading and seek help where you need it. Of course if you are a designer and are reading this post, we probably don’t need to worry about your SEO education ![]()
Mike The Internet Guy’s Blog








6 responses so far ↓
Lee Odden // Jan 29th 2007 at 7:48 am
Ya gotta love practical examples. Thanks Mike. Seems to me there’s more of a potential market for SEO training within the web design community than most people think.
mike // Jan 29th 2007 at 10:58 am
Lee,
I completely agree with you. Too many clients are becoming frustrated with the industry in general from the issues caused by a lack of education.
Andrew // Feb 13th 2007 at 4:09 pm
Interesting post. As a designer, and not an expert in SEO, I think it is important to take on board your experiences. I don’t claim to offer SEO services although I suspect that much of what I do in the planning stages could be sold that way if I were so inclined.
Are the problems you find swayed to one particular problem area?, i.e. are they information based, for example, poor overall site structure / information planning, or are they mainly deeper issues such as old-style / non-semantic coding and using images in place of text without using adequate replacement techniques.
I would be interested to read more in depth criticisms.
mike // Feb 13th 2007 at 5:57 pm
Hi Andrew,
The problems are across the board. Anything from using images where text would be appropriate to not thinking about ‘after design’ strategies with the client. Many designers I have seen claim to offer search engine optimization, but really they do nothing of the sort. Sometimes they mean meta tag configuration or submitting the site to Google, etc
Andrew // Feb 14th 2007 at 12:28 am
Thanks Mike.
It is a little disheartening to hear that so many in my field are still on the wrong track, but I guess you get that in any industry.
The SEO Team // Feb 23rd 2007 at 11:57 am
Most people don’t know that Web design and SEO Web design are different. Anyone can build a pretty website using Flash, Frames and a Content Management System. But in today’s fast paced world if your website isn’t built as an SEO web design website you’ve lost the race already.
Leave a Comment